2016
_NATURE ENVIRONMENT Geology

_Science Underfoot

The Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University celebrated the 200th anniversary of the geological map that laid the foundation for earth science with a rare public viewing this year.

_Ted Daeschler

Daeschler is a professor in the Department of Biodiversity, Earth and Environmental Science in the College of Arts and Sciences and curator and chair of Vertebrate Zoology in the Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University.

Among the artifacts housed within the collections of the Academy of Natural Sciences are many remarkable items that never see the light of day.

At least, until one celebrates an anniversary.

“This was the first detailed geological map, and maps like these are the foundation for doing earth science. To be able to express on a map the geology underfoot in a sensible and usable way was a huge step.”

—Ted Daschler,
Academy of Natural Sciences

A massive map of Great Britain created by geologist William Smith in 1815 was brought out this year in honor of its 200th birthday. It was the world’s first nationwide geological map, and it helped develop stratigraphy and biostratigraphy as we know it.

When Smith created his map, scientists were still debating the origin and structure of the earth. Smith’s brilliance came with a deeper understanding of the continuity of strata (stratigraphy) and the use of fossils within those layers to help with correlation (biostratigraphy). Both of these are foundational ideas in unraveling the history of the planet.

The map shows England, Wales and part of Scotland and it measures about five feet wide and nearly 10 feet high, a necessary size to meet Smith’s specification of five miles to the inch.

Smith’s expertise came from years as a land surveyor and canal builder, mapping coal formations and assessing values for landowners.

“Smith began to put evidence together about the geological formations that were encountered in coal mines and as they surveyed or dug canals,” says Daeschler. “He began to realize that geology was predictable; that you can map it and understand that a sequence in one area is often repeated in another area. That was all somewhat revolutionary.”